Oct 12, 2026 · 22 min
Campaign ads test persuasion, turnout and Democratic ambition
The Most INSANE Midterm Ads We’ve Seen So Far
The episode shows how provocative messages can do more than attack opponents by shaping turnout, partisan energy and investment in close races.
- 1The Maduro capture ad projects military strength while hosts question its political value amid broader administration problems.
- 2Attacks on Annie Andrews use transgender issues, abortion and an artificial Southern voice to target persuasion and turnout.
- 3The Epstein-files ad against Roger Marshall raises whether scandal can alienate Trump voters, suppress Republicans or help Democrats.
Don't miss
The hosts debate whether the Roger Marshall ad’s Epstein-files message can move Trump voters, suppress Republican turnout or mainly motivate Democrats.
The brief
Dan Pfeiffer and Tim Miller open by treating campaign ads as strategic instruments, asking whether their real purpose is persuasion, turnout, partisan energy or some combination.
A federally funded ad celebrating Nicolás Maduro’s capture adopts a macho tone; the hosts question whether that image can offset foreign-policy and economic problems.
In South Carolina, attacks on Annie Andrews over transgender issues and abortion meet her denial, while an artificial Southern voice becomes part of the message’s credibility problem.
The discussion widens to Democratic investment in difficult Senate and House races, weighing immediate gains against the possibility of building a larger Senate majority.
A Senate Majority PAC ad linking Roger Marshall to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes prompts the episode’s central question: can scandal persuade Trump voters, suppress them or energize Democrats?