Oct 15, 2026 · 52 min
Candace challenges Zacharia’s legal credentials and assassination claims
Liars Who Lie: TPUSA Tried To Scrub THIS SCANDAL From The Web. Katie Zacharia Comes Clean (Kinda).
The episode links a disputed investigation to broader arguments about political mobilization, government power, and the death penalty.
- 1Candace questions Katie Zacharia’s explanation for presenting herself as a lawyer without retaking the bar exam.
- 2The discussion urges political involvement after an attack while promoting Turning Point USA-linked ballot-chasing efforts.
- 3Candace argues that Charlie Kirk’s assassination involved powerful figures and rejects the claim that the accused shooter acted alone.
Don't miss
Candace rejects the claim that the accused rooftop shooter acted alone and presents her theory about powerful figures’ involvement in Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
The brief
Candace Owens opens by questioning Katie Zacharia’s admission that she is not an attorney, then examines alleged evidence handling, changing clothing, and inconsistencies in the investigation.
The conversation shifts from the alleged attack and vandalism to political mobilization, with a guest urging involvement and Candace promoting the Commit 100 ballot-chasing initiative.
Zacharia explains her legal background, law-school timeline, marriage, move to China, and failure to retake the bar; Candace challenges whether those circumstances explain her presentation as a lawyer.
A debate over the death penalty broadens into a warning about corrupt governments, political persecution, gulags, and future regimes executing ideological opponents.
The sharpest turn comes when Candace rejects the idea that the accused rooftop shooter acted alone and alleges powerful figures connected to the so-called Epstein class were involved.
Books & mentions
Some links are affiliate links — PodLume may earn a commission if you buy.
