Oct 16, 2026 · 46 min
Climate economist says humanity still has choices
Nobel Prize Economist: 3 Choices Every Country Has On Climate | Ep. 456 with Gary Yohe
Gary Yohe frames climate change as a risk-management problem in which mitigation, adaptation, and damage reduction remain consequential despite unavoidable impacts.
- 1Climate policy must combine emissions cuts with preparation for impacts already locked in.
- 2Carbon markets can reduce emissions when they limit permits and create credible incentives to trade them.
- 3Misinformation and politicized science increase climate risk by obstructing practical efforts to reduce suffering.
Don't miss
Yohe distills climate action into three choices—abate, adapt, or suffer—while explaining why uncertainty demands iterative risk management.
The brief
Gary Yohe argues that climate change is both an environmental and economic challenge: economic activity drives emissions, while economics helps weigh scarce resources, policy choices, and damages.
His practical framework is stark but not fatalistic: abate emissions, adapt to consequences already arriving, and reduce the damages that neither strategy can prevent.
Yohe says misinformation, complacency, and attacks on science obstruct preparation, while policymakers should treat climate action as iterative risk management rather than one permanent plan.
The conversation moves from the IPCC’s Nobel Peace Prize and politicized science to carbon markets, including the European Union’s emissions-trading system.
Yohe’s most durable message is that uncertainty does not justify delay; it makes flexible policy, honest assessment, and hope-driven action more important.
Weekly email
State of the Pod, every Monday
The week's most-discussed names and stories from podcasts, with the moments behind them. Free, five minutes, unsubscribe in one click.