Sep 11, 2026 · 1h 17m
Hanson links 9/11’s legacy to borders, cities and national strength
Victor Davis Hanson: The 25th Anniversary of 9/11
The discussion uses the 25th anniversary of 9/11 to examine how security, immigration, governance and foreign-policy arguments have shifted.
- 1Hanson argues that border security and deportation have become central drivers of American political realignment.
- 2The conversation connects progressive urban governance and therapeutic approaches to broader disputes over accountability and civic order.
- 3Canada’s demographic policies, relations with the United States and oil exports become a test of national identity and practical statecraft.
Don't miss
Hanson uses a school-fight anecdote to explain why deterrence depends on projecting strength and refusing intimidation.
The brief
The 25th anniversary of 9/11 frames a broader reckoning: Hanson and Jack Fowler ask how American political attitudes, immigration policy and urban governance changed after the attacks.
Hanson argues that border security and deportation should reshape electoral politics, while criticizing media accusations of extremism and the economic consequences of mass illegal immigration.
The Lindsay Clancy mistrial shifts the discussion toward postpartum depression, criminal responsibility and whether therapeutic explanations minimize victims and overlook fathers’ relationships with children.
Canada becomes a second case study in demographic and political transformation, with disputes over anti-American rhetoric, national identity, welfare pressures and the technicalities of oil exports.
A school-fight anecdote anchors Hanson’s argument for deterrence and projected strength before the conversation turns to Tucker Carlson, algebra, Iran and access to power.
The episode’s sharpest tension is between symbolic proximity to President Trump and the harder obligation to make serious, accountable arguments about foreign policy.