Aug 25, 2026 · 1h 2m
Trump administration faces fresh tests on voting and executive power
If at First You Don’t (Constitutionally) Succeed, Try, Try Again
The episode traces how procedural rulings and constitutional limits could shape fights over elections, citizenship, federal prosecutors, and interstate authority.
- 1The Supreme Court’s mail-in voting intervention addressed timing and procedure, leaving the underlying election rules unresolved.
- 2A renewed birthright citizenship challenge tests whether the administration can expand narrow historical exceptions recognized under the Citizenship Clause.
- 3Federal courts have rejected efforts to bypass Senate confirmation for acting U.S. attorneys, setting up a possible Supreme Court dispute.
Don't miss
The hosts explain why the Supreme Court’s mail-in voting stay may decide the dispute through procedure and timing before reaching the underlying merits.
The brief
Mary and Andrew open by previewing the show’s move to weekly video episodes, then turn to a cluster of legal fights involving voting, citizenship, and executive power.
The Supreme Court stayed an injunction involving the administration’s mail-in voting order without deciding its merits, while timing and standing threaten to shape any later challenge.
A separate League of Women Voters injunction remains active, keeping the election dispute headed toward another round of district court and likely Supreme Court litigation.
The hosts examine a renewed birthright citizenship challenge, arguing that the administration’s new categories are vague, overbroad, and inconsistent with Supreme Court precedent.
Federal courts have rejected the administration’s strategy for installing acting U.S. attorneys without Senate confirmation, while a Minnesota–Texas extradition dispute raises a separate constitutional test.