Nov 7, 2026 · 1h 7m
Listen from 37:31
Listen at 37:31
Democrats test a populist coalition across the South and Midwest
How the Democrats Did It
The episode examines whether Democrats can turn anti-Trump energy, economic populism, religious openness and local credibility into a durable governing coalition.
- 1Successful Democratic campaigns paired opposition to Trump and billionaire power with concrete economic concerns and locally resonant candidates.
- 2Religious language, disciplined messaging and respect for working-class voters helped Democrats reach beyond the party’s traditional coalition.
- 3The emerging coalition faces its hardest test after Election Day: governing effectively while persuading voters who once supported Trump.
Don't miss
The discussion of Jon Ossoff’s campaign shows how detailed stories about Trump family deals and public subsidies turned corruption into a message about rising costs and declining services.
The brief
Michelle Goldberg joins Ezra Klein to examine Democratic victories across Texas, Georgia, Michigan, Kansas and the broader South and Midwest, asking what changed beneath the results.
James Talarico and Gina Hinojosa used anti-Trump and anti-billionaire populism, local fights over data centers and vouchers, and a more open religious language to make Democratic politics feel immediate.
Jon Ossoff turned Trump family deals, public subsidies and corruption into an economic story, while his formal, selective style showed how restraint can outperform constant attention-seeking.
Abdul El-Sayed and Adam Hamilton widened the test: one through relentless focus on gas and groceries, the other through religious credibility, liberal openness and attacks on medical debt.
The central question is whether this coalition can move from resistance to governing—and persuade working-class and former Trump voters through respect, delivery and material improvement.
What was said on this episode
16 statements · 4 positive · 8 negative · 1 mixed · 3 neutral
Trump gained Mexican-American voters in Texas before terrorizing them through his policies.
“Donald Trump got a bunch of new voters among mostly Mexican-American people in Texas, and then he absolutely terrorized them.”
Listen at 2:25
Texas is a major center of data-center construction.
“Texas is a major center of the data center build out.”
Listen at 3:40
Data-center noise is harming livestock near Texas facilities.
“the noise is like killing their livestock”
Listen at 4:00
Texas voters were highly dissatisfied with school vouchers.
“they were also furious about school vouchers”
Listen at 6:55
Polls now show voters viewing Republicans as the elitist party.
“People now in polls see the Republican Party as the elitist party.”
Listen at 19:23
Ossoff can turn complex corruption details into compelling symbolic stories.
“he knows how to take these like really wonky details, right? It's like hard to build a drama out of like tungsten mining rights in Kazakhstan. But he knows how to tell a story about that and to make that story symbolic.”
Listen at 32:56
The South has become electorally unreliable for Republicans.
“the South has become unreliable now for the Republican Party”
Listen at 36:34
Republicans’ Southern coalition has rapidly weakened.
“their coalition has evaporated overnight”
Listen at 39:10
Democratic leaders need to revise their criteria for candidate electability.
“a democratic establishment needs to update its sense of what makes a candidate electable”
Listen at 44:41
The Democratic establishment fails to select candidates for charisma, star power, and authentic movements.
“it does not care about and does not select for star power. It does not care about and does not select for charisma. It does not care about and does not select for people creating an authentic movement around them”
Listen at 44:46
A relentlessly populist message can build a broader working-class coalition.
“there's a kind of like more working class coalition that you can bring together with a relentlessly populist message”
Listen at 49:05
Medicare for All was not a significant electoral liability for El-Sayed.
“he ran on Medicare for All, which we used to think was like an extremely electorally dangerous position. And it barely registered as sort of a point of attack.”
Listen at 50:23
Medicare for All is popular but difficult to enact because financing is challenging.
“Medicare for All, in its broader forms, is hard to pass because it's very hard to pay for. As a concept, it is very, very popular.”
Listen at 50:43
The emerging Democratic Party is increasingly focused on oligarchy and corruption.
“the focus on oligarchy, which I don't even remember as kind of using that word in 2018”
Listen at 57:40
Trump-era corruption enables Democrats to position themselves against elites, corporations, and billionaires.
“it has created the conditions for Democrats to be the anti-elite, anti-corporate, anti-billionaire class”
Listen at 58:09
Democrats are unlikely to raise taxes or institute a wealth tax soon.
“I would be very surprised if they're able to, say, raise taxes or institute a wealth tax anytime soon.”
Listen at 58:25
Statements are attributed to the speaker as said on the episode and reflect their view at the time, not PodLume's. They are not advice.
Weekly email
State of the Pod, every Monday
The week's most-discussed names and stories from podcasts, with the moments behind them. Free, five minutes, unsubscribe in one click.