Jun 1, 2026 · 50 min
Holmgren’s contract turns a bad playoff run into an Oklahoma City dilemma
Hour 3 - The Chet Holmgren Problem?
The episode weighs whether Chet Holmgren’s Western Conference Finals collapse should change Oklahoma City’s plans before a massive extension begins.
- 1Chet Holmgren’s poor playoff showing raises questions about his fit and value ahead of a reported $240 million contract.
- 2A Knicks–Spurs Finals would pair New York’s championship drought with Victor Wembanyama’s emergence as San Antonio’s centerpiece.
- 3Shedeur Sanders’ reported $17.7 million merchandise haul shows his cultural and family brand outpacing his on-field earnings.
Don't miss
Listeners deliver rapid-fire, often comic advice for Chet Holmgren after his four-point Game 7 and 31-minute shotless stretch.
The brief
Ben Maller frames Chet Holmgren’s Western Conference Finals performance as more than a bad stretch: with a reported $240 million contract looming, Oklahoma City may face a roster decision.
The proposed Knicks–Spurs Finals carries two different kinds of intrigue: New York’s long championship drought and Victor Wembanyama’s rise as San Antonio’s centerpiece.
Shedeur Sanders becomes the hour’s other central case study after reports that he earned $17.7 million through merchandise licensing, dwarfing his playing salary.
Listener calls turn the sports debates into workplace stories, Las Vegas arguments about Circus Circus, and a riddle whose answer was union steam fitter.
The standout arrives in the advice segment, where listeners respond to Holmgren’s four-point Game 7 with suggestions ranging from changing teams to joining the Washington Generals or Savannah Bananas.
Weekly email
State of the Pod, every Monday
The week's most-discussed names and stories from podcasts, with the moments behind them. Free, five minutes, unsubscribe in one click.