Prof G Markets
Prof G Markets

Oct 24, 2026 · 14 min

Investors may be looking for the AI bubble in the wrong market

The AI Bubble Isn't Where You Think It Is

The episode examines whether AI spending is destroying capital now—or building a larger, less visible risk beyond public markets.

3 key takeaways
  1. 1Strategists and chip executives warn that AI investment has intensified speculation and could destroy capital.
  2. 2Public-market valuations may not capture the most consequential AI excesses still developing elsewhere.
  3. 3Nvidia, Anthropic, and other industry players illustrate how infrastructure and model-building drive the investment debate.

Don't miss

The episode’s sharpest turn comes when Ed Elson argues that the most significant AI bubble may still be developing outside public markets.

The brief

Ed Elson frames the AI investment boom as a question of capital destruction, drawing on warnings from equity strategists and chip-industry executives.

The episode shifts attention beyond public markets, arguing that visible stock speculation may not be where the most consequential AI excesses are developing.

Nvidia, CoreWeave, and other infrastructure names anchor the discussion of the spending required to build and run increasingly ambitious AI systems.

Anthropic and CEO Dario Amodei bring the model-building side of the debate into view, connecting AI progress with the scale of investment behind it.

The central takeaway is deliberately unresolved: the public-market bubble may be only the early, visible edge of a larger risk.

What was said on this episode

29 statements · 2 positive · 24 negative · 1 mixed · 2 neutral

  1. Ed Elsonon CoreWeaveNegative2:26

    Credit markets indicated CoreWeave might soon fail.

    “the credit markets were screaming loud and clear, this company might be about to implode.”

    Listen at 2:26

  2. Ed Elsonon CoreWeaveNegative2:35

    CoreWeave borrowed more than it can probably afford.

    “the company borrowed more than it can probably afford.”

    Listen at 2:35

  3. AI data centers are more expensive and difficult to build than expected.

    “data centers turn out to be more expensive and difficult to build than originally anticipated.”

    Listen at 3:04

  4. Ed Elsonon China open-weight AI modelsNegative3:16

    China’s open-weight models cut AI token prices by half.

    “Their extraordinarily cheap open-weight models have cut AI token prices in half”

    Listen at 3:16

  5. Ed Elsonon OpenAI pricingNegative3:21

    Cheap Chinese models forced OpenAI and other frontier labs to cut prices up to 80%.

    “forcing frontier labs like OpenAI to reduce their prices by up to 80%.”

    Listen at 3:21

  6. Ed Elsonon AI economicsNegative3:28

    AI development costs are rising while AI prices are falling.

    “the cost to build AI is going up. And the price to sell it is going down.”

    Listen at 3:28

  7. Ed Elsonon AI neocloudsNegative3:47

    Warning signs of a neocloud implosion are emerging.

    “the warning signs are definitely starting to show.”

    Listen at 3:47

  8. Ed Elsonon AI implosion riskNeutral4:25

    Public markets have already priced in AI-implosion risks.

    “the risks of an AI implosion are already priced in.”

    Listen at 4:25

  9. AI stock valuations have declined despite rising prices.

    “valuations have actually come down.”

    Listen at 4:44

  10. Ed Elsonon Nvidia data-center businessNeutral5:06

    Data centers account for more than 90% of Nvidia’s business.

    “Data centers make up more than 90% of NVIDIA's business.”

    Listen at 5:06

  11. Ed Elsonon AI customersNegative5:16

    Some major AI customers might disappear financially.

    “some of their customers might drop off the map.”

    Listen at 5:16

  12. Ed Elsonon Broadcom, Micron, and SK Hynix valuationsNegative5:29

    Broadcom, Micron, and SK Hynix earnings multiples declined substantially.

    “Broadcom's earnings multiple has fallen 54%. Micron's has fallen 56%. SK Hynix's has fallen 49%.”

    Listen at 5:29

  13. Ed Elsonon CoreWeave, Iron, and Cypher sharesNegative5:46
    “CoreWeave is down 52% in the past year. Iron's down 53%. Cypher is down 55%.”

    Listen at 5:46

  14. Ed Elsonon Meta, Alphabet, Amazon, and MicrosoftMixed6:55

    Meta, Alphabet, Amazon, and Microsoft are neither buys nor sells.

    “These are no longer buys in my view, but they're not sells either.”

    Listen at 6:55

  15. Ed Elsonon OpenAI and AnthropicNegative7:14

    OpenAI and Anthropic are the most overvalued major AI companies.

    “The two biggest names in AI are also the most overvalued. OpenAI and Anthropic.”

    Listen at 7:14

  16. Ed Elsonon OpenAI and AnthropicNegative7:44

    OpenAI and Anthropic lose billions of dollars annually.

    “They're losing billions of dollars a year.”

    Listen at 7:44

  17. Ed Elsonon OpenAI and Anthropic business modelsNegative7:46

    OpenAI and Anthropic’s business models may never work.

    “it's not clear if their business models are ever going to actually work.”

    Listen at 7:46

  18. Ed Elsonon Anthropic adjusted financialsNegative8:05

    Anthropic’s adjusted figures likely exclude revenue sharing and training costs.

    “it very likely strips out revenue sharing agreements as well as their largest expense by far, which is their training costs”

    Listen at 8:05

  19. Ed Elsonon Anthropic valuationNegative8:30

    Anthropic’s $2 trillion valuation equals nearly 30 times revenue run rate.

    “At a $2 trillion valuation, Anthropic trades at nearly 30 times its revenue run rate.”

    Listen at 8:30

  20. OpenAI and Anthropic command exceptionally high valuations.

    “These are the kinds of prices only luxury handbag designers can get away with.”

    Listen at 8:43

  21. Ed Elsonon AI startup bubbleNegative9:36

    The main AI bubble is concentrated in private AI startups.

    “we don't have an AI bubble, we have an AI startup bubble.”

    Listen at 9:36

  22. Ed Elsonon Anthropic valuationNegative9:45

    Anthropic’s valuation would halve if publicly traded.

    “Its valuation would be cut in half.”

    Listen at 9:45

  23. Ed Elsonon Anthropic valuationNegative9:53

    Applying Nvidia’s price-to-sales multiple values Anthropic at roughly $1 trillion.

    “the AI Lab's valuation drops to roughly $1 trillion.”

    Listen at 9:53

  24. Applying Nvidia’s multiple would halve OpenAI’s valuation.

    “Do the same thing to OpenAI, and its valuation gets halved as well.”

    Listen at 9:57

  25. Ed Elsonon Thinking Machines valuationNegative10:16

    VCs valued Thinking Machines at four times Snap’s value despite far lower revenue.

    “thinking machines was four times more valuable than Snap, despite generating a 60th of its revenue.”

    Listen at 10:16

  26. Ed Elsonon unnamed AI companyNegative10:23

    Private investors valued an unnamed AI company at $32 billion without a product.

    “They priced another AI company at $32 billion, despite not having a product.”

    Listen at 10:23

  27. Ed Elsonon Anthropic IPOPositive10:45

    Anthropic will go public in one month.

    “Anthropic goes public in a month.”

    Listen at 10:45

  28. Ed Elsonon Anthropic IPOPositive10:47

    Anthropic filed its prospectus and is reportedly ready for its IPO.

    “The company has filed its prospectus and everything is reportedly ready to go.”

    Listen at 10:47

  29. Ed Elsonon Anthropic IPONegative11:39

    Anthropic may delay its IPO because of market uncertainty.

    “Delays IPO cites market uncertainty.”

    Listen at 11:39

Statements are attributed to the speaker as said on the episode and reflect their view at the time, not PodLume's. They are not advice.

Weekly email

State of the Pod, every Monday

The week's most-discussed names and stories from podcasts, with the moments behind them. Free, five minutes, unsubscribe in one click.

Listen to the full episode and explore every guest, topic, and moment on PodLume.

Investors may be looking for the AI bubble in the wrong market · PodLume