Sep 17, 2026 · 1h 3m
Iran and gas prices test Trump’s midterm strength
Is Iran Making Trump Into Jimmy Carter? Making Sense of Talarico’s Texas Pivots (with Michael Cohen)
The episode examines whether economic pressure could reshape the midterms while candidates in Ohio, Texas, and Michigan recalibrate their strategies.
- 1Iran and rising gas prices could revive comparisons between Donald Trump and Jimmy Carter by weakening his economic standing.
- 2James Talarico’s Texas strategy hinges on broadening his appeal without alienating Democratic voters on cultural issues.
- 3A narrowly divided House or Senate could produce difficult governing conditions after the midterms.
Don't miss
Michael Cohen explains why the Texas and Ohio contests reveal different risks in negative advertising and ideological repositioning.
The brief
Justin and Michael Cohen open with the question of whether Iran and rising gas prices could damage Donald Trump enough to echo Jimmy Carter’s economic troubles.
Ohio’s governor’s race becomes a case study in negative advertising, as Vivek Ramaswamy’s attacks on Amy Acton raise questions about character attacks and campaign misfires.
In Texas, heavy spending and the Paxton–Talarico contest expose the challenge of building statewide appeal while navigating football, cultural issues, and party pressure.
The Michigan discussion turns to Abdul El-Sayed’s association with Hassan Piker and the political difficulty of distancing from an influential online audience.
The closing scenarios range from Republican control of both chambers to a narrow Democratic House majority or Republican Senate, each carrying serious governing constraints.
What was said on this episode
12 statements · 5 positive · 4 negative · 1 mixed · 2 neutral
Early attacks on Amy Acton indicate serious campaign or polling problems for Vivek Ramaswamy.
“seeing an ad against Amy Acton this early is pretty much an oh shit moment. uh for the campaign like oh god you know something in our polling is terrible something in in the whole vibes of the campaign is terrible we've got to do something now to go talk about the other guy”
Listen at 26:49
Personal attacks on Amy Acton could backfire against Vivek Ramaswamy.
“there's a possibility of boomerang right so if all of a sudden you start seeing any acting with her family and everything looks very normal you know vivek looks like the guy is just you know shouting mcshow face and you end up in a situation where it boomerangs back on the candidate that send it out”
Listen at 28:50
Outside-group attacks on Amy Acton are strategically defensible for Vivek Ramaswamy.
“what they're trying to do is to try to help Vivek. I would say, again, too early. But, you know, as long as it's coming from an outside group and it's not like Vivek's standing there saying, she's an alcoholic and she beats her kids. You know, then it is roughly defensible from a campaign strategy standpoint and even execution.”
Listen at 29:52
Polling showing Talarico ahead may undercount socially unacceptable Paxton supporters.
“I think there's a... a non-response error in there of people who are not taking the surveys, who think they understand that it's socially unacceptable to like Paxton, so they're just not taking the poll.”
Listen at 37:52
Ken Paxton will narrowly defeat James Talarico in Texas.
“So I think Paxton's going to squeak by. I don't see Tauro Rico winning this.”
Listen at 38:10
James Talarico’s transgender-policy positioning is a conventional general-election pivot toward the center.
“this is a classic pivot to the middle, you know, general election strategy, right?”
Listen at 41:35
Talarico’s positioning is intended to blunt anticipated attacks about transgender issues.
“the reason why you do that now is because you're waiting on the they-them ad, right?”
Listen at 42:09
Talarico must fund advertising to make his transgender-policy repositioning effective.
“It's not just sufficient enough for him to say it on Fox. He actually has to put money behind it”
Listen at 44:49
Abdul El-Sayed should publicly sever ties with Hassan Piker.
“Son, you need to cut this guy loose. there's the answer right and you know you just you do a sit down interview um and you say you know what it you know it's taken me a long time to get there because i'm a loyal guy but that can't stand you know we have to we have to yeah i he has to cut the guy loose”
Listen at 48:19
Abdul El-Sayed must moderate his political presentation to win Michigan.
“He still has to find himself a place to normie, because right now he's not normie, right?”
Listen at 52:42
The most likely midterm outcome is a narrow Democratic House majority and near-even Republican Senate.
“Winning name only. It's actually the most fun scenario for all of us who watch this because everyone's miserable. Right? You win the House, but you have like a five-seat majority.”
Listen at 56:21
A narrowly divided post-midterm Congress would be relatively dysfunctional.
“And also votes he'd prefer not to take. I mean, so there's going to be everyone in this scenario is going to be unhappy. And that is essentially where the country is anyway. They're very unhappy with all their choices and they're basically going to get a Congress that is going to be relatively dysfunctional.”
Listen at 57:31
Statements are attributed to the speaker as said on the episode and reflect their view at the time, not PodLume's. They are not advice.
Books & mentions
Some links are affiliate links — PodLume may earn a commission if you buy.
