Sep 4, 2026 · 48 min
Mistrial reshapes Lindsay Clancy’s legal future
BREAKING: Judge Declares Mistrial in Lindsay Clancy Trial! Chaos Ensues As Reddington Fights Back
The ruling interrupts a high-profile murder trial while raising questions about Clancy’s next legal steps and the credibility of competing public narratives.
- 1A judge declared a mistrial in Lindsay Clancy’s case, reportedly after one juror held out.
- 2Clancy’s attorneys are appealing to the Supreme Court as the case moves into an uncertain next phase.
- 3Kevin Reddington disputes New York Times allegations and says the report included false claims about him.
Don't miss
The episode’s defining moment is the reported one-juror holdout that led the judge to declare a mistrial.
The brief
Peter Zachary Gonzalez opens with breaking news: a judge declared a mistrial in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial, reportedly after one juror held out.
The ruling leaves Clancy’s legal future unsettled, while her attorneys pursue an appeal to the Supreme Court and the case enters its next phase.
Kevin Reddington says a New York Times front-page story accusing him of sexual harassment included false claims about his presence on a movie set.
Reddington also criticizes the paper for not retracting the story or apologizing, turning the episode toward a broader dispute over public allegations and accountability.
The episode connects the mistrial coverage with related appearances, including Steve Sarawitz on Laura Knighty’s Court of Random Opinion.
Books & mentions
Weekly email
State of the Pod, every Monday
The week's most-discussed names and stories from podcasts, with the moments behind them. Free, five minutes, unsubscribe in one click.