The Megyn Kelly Show
The Megyn Kelly Show

Aug 27, 2026 · 20 min

Secret Service probes leaks as Meta accepts sweeping youth-safety terms

Secret Service Leak Investigation, Meta’s $18B Settlement, Deadly Flooding in Nepal: AM Update 8/27

The episode connects questions about presidential security, platform accountability, criminal responsibility, and a deadly Himalayan disaster.

3 key takeaways
  1. 1Secret Service employees face scrutiny over leaks involving Donald Trump’s movements, including a decoy aircraft and a Qatari-gifted plane.
  2. 2Meta’s proposed settlement combines an $18 billion payment with tighter teen defaults, age checks, parental controls, and less personalized feeds.
  3. 3A prosecution psychiatrist says Lindsay Clancy remained criminally responsible, while the defense points to her severe mental-health crisis and treatment efforts.

Don't miss

The prosecution’s forensic psychiatrist argues that Lindsay Clancy’s phone call showed awareness and helped ensure her husband stayed away from the home.

The brief

Emily Jashinsky opens with four stories: an unusual Secret Service leak inquiry, Meta’s youth-safety settlement, the Lindsay Clancy trial, and deadly flooding near the Nepal-Tibet border.

Three Secret Service communications employees reportedly lost clearances and access amid leaks about Donald Trump’s movements, including a decoy aircraft and a Qatari-gifted plane.

The inquiry’s unusual edge is Anthony Guglielmi’s reported inclusion; Susan Crabtree details his forceful defense of the agency after the Butler assassination attempt.

Meta’s proposed $18 billion settlement would pair financial penalties with teen time limits, overnight blocks, age verification, parental controls, and non-personalized feeds.

In rebuttal, Gregory Savoff says Lindsay Clancy had a mental disease but remained responsible, while the defense emphasizes her severe crisis and attempts to get treatment.

The episode closes on the stakes beyond one settlement or trial: security institutions, technology companies, and courts are being pressed to define accountability.

What was said on this episode

10 statements · 1 positive · 5 negative · 2 mixed · 2 neutral

  1. Susan Crabtreeon Qatari-gifted Air Force OneNegative3:42

    The Qatari-gifted aircraft lacked top protocols against surface-to-air missiles.

    “the Qatari gifted Air Force One did not have some of the highest security protocols that could counter. a surface-to-air missile”

    Listen at 3:42

  2. Anthony Guglielmi’s suspension and clearance action are highly unusual.

    “it is really bizarre for the comms director to be one of those people, to be suspended and have their security clearance revoked or suspended.”

    Listen at 5:37

  3. Anthony Guglielmi aggressively defended the Secret Service.

    “he's been more of a company man and he's defended the agency in an aggressive way”

    Listen at 6:06

  4. Susan Crabtreeon Kimberly Cheadle’s explanationNegative6:38

    Kimberly Cheadle’s explanation about the unsecured building was ridiculous.

    “that was absolutely a ridiculous explanation.”

    Listen at 6:38

  5. Susan Crabtreeon Security resources at Jill Biden’s event versus Butler rallyNeutral7:41

    Grassley’s report found Jill Biden’s event had more security assets than the Butler rally.

    “Senator Grassley had done a report investigating it and found that there was more security assets at Jill Biden's, at least when it came to post-standards, than at the Butler rally.”

    Listen at 7:41

  6. The allegations say Meta deliberately built addictive products and misled the public.

    “the company deliberately built addictive products while misleading the public about the risks to young users.”

    Listen at 8:02

  7. Emily Jashinskyon Meta settlementNegative12:18

    Meta’s settlement will trigger many more lawsuits against other companies.

    “Well, this is going to bring a lot more lawsuits against a lot more companies.”

    Listen at 12:18

  8. Emily Jashinskyon Meta settlement decisionPositive12:54

    Meta’s settlement decision is rational.

    “This is a rational choice for Meta.”

    Listen at 12:54

  9. Meta had strong legal arguments but needed to change its products.

    “Meta understood it had good legal arguments, but that they also understood that they had to change their products.”

    Listen at 12:58

  10. Emily Jashinskyon Lindsay Clancy’s symptomsNeutral17:13

    Testing found no indication Clancy exaggerated or fabricated symptoms.

    “testing found no indication Clancy was exaggerating or fabricating her symptoms”

    Listen at 17:13

Statements are attributed to the speaker as said on the episode and reflect their view at the time, not PodLume's. They are not advice.

Weekly email

State of the Pod, every Monday

The week's most-discussed names and stories from podcasts, with the moments behind them. Free, five minutes, unsubscribe in one click.

Listen to the full episode and explore every guest, topic, and moment on PodLume.