Sep 3, 2026 · 18 min

Uncertainty shapes how voters think and leaders communicate

You Can’t Poll Away Uncertainty

Election polls and forecasts can organize ambiguity, but the demand for certainty may also fuel anxiety, misinformation, and overconfident politics.

3 key takeaways

1The brain seeks certainty for safety, yet uncertainty can also drive discovery, achievement, and better decisions.
2Information abundance makes ambiguity more salient, while low tolerance for uncertainty can increase fear and misinformation.
3Political leaders may build credibility by acknowledging errors while pairing clear principles with flexibility.

Don't miss

Stolzoff explains how acknowledging errors can increase political credibility, challenging the assumption that leaders must project certainty.

The brief

Simone Stolzoff opens with two familiar responses to uncertainty: compulsive information gathering and impulsive action, setting up the episode’s central psychological tension.

As election season brings a stream of polls, forecasts, and political events, Stolzoff argues that modern abundance and constant information exposure can make uncertainty feel even more urgent.

The brain works as a prediction machine, so certainty can feel protective; yet uncertainty also creates room for discovery, achievement, and more deliberate judgment.

The conversation links intolerance of uncertainty to fear, misinformation, and attraction to leaders who promise confident answers, especially when existential unease is mistaken for immediate insecurity.

The episode’s sharpest political question is whether leaders can admit errors without losing credibility, combining clear principles with flexibility rather than pretending complex problems have simple solutions.

Prediction markets and forecasting models may clarify uncertainty, but the discussion warns that quantifying ambiguity can become another way of avoiding what remains unknown.

What was said on this episode

13 statements · 3 positive · 9 negative · 1 neutral

Simone Stolzoffon Intolerance of uncertaintyNegative0:00
Intolerance of uncertainty tends to produce obsessive information gathering or impulsive action.
“When people are particularly intolerant of uncertainty, they tend to exhibit one of two behaviors.”
Listen at 0:00
Simone Stolzoffon Global uncertaintyNegative3:29
The world has become more uncertain by some measures.
“the world has gotten more uncertain by some measures”
Listen at 3:29
Simone Stolzoffon Tolerance for uncertaintyNegative3:52
People’s tolerance for uncertainty is declining.
“our tolerance for uncertainty is in decline”
Listen at 3:52
Simone Stolzoffon SmartphonesNegative4:31
Phones increase awareness of uncertainty and precarity.
“there's this greater consciousness of all of the uncertainty or precarity out there”
Listen at 4:31
Simone Stolzoffon SmartphonesNegative4:37
Phones create expectations that answers should be immediately available.
“phones create the expectation that answers should be readily available”
Listen at 4:37
Simone Stolzoffon Human brainsNeutral6:34
Human brains are biologically predisposed to seek certainty.
“our brains are wired to grasp for certainty”
Listen at 6:34
Simone Stolzoffon Certainty about future eventsNegative7:39
Certainty about future events is inherently impossible.
“for anything that hasn't happened yet, certainty, by definition, is a fallacy”
Listen at 7:39
Simone Stolzoffon Discomfort with uncertaintyNegative9:20
Discomfort with uncertainty is especially a problem under conditions of abundance.
“this problem of discomfort for uncertainty is a problem of abundance”
Listen at 9:20
Simone Stolzoffon Political leadersPositive13:42
The best leaders should acknowledge what they do not know.
“the best leaders, in my mind, are leaders who also have the humility to admit what they don't know”
Listen at 13:42
Simone Stolzoffon Hubristic thinkingNegative14:22
Hubristic thinking can attach people to rigid views of the future.
“that hubristic thinking can also lead us to attaching ourselves to a very strict idea of the future”
Listen at 14:22
Simone Stolzoffon Rigid 10-year business plansNegative14:37
Rigid 10-year plans can cause businesses to miss changing conditions.
“if you're too fixed to a 10-year plan, you can miss out on the ways in which the world is changing around you”
Listen at 14:37
Simone Stolzoffon Scientists admitting past errorsPositive15:55
Scientists who admit past errors are perceived as more credible and trustworthy.
“By admitting your past errors, these scientists were perceived as more credible and more trustworthy than their peers.”
Listen at 15:55
Simone Stolzoffon Good leadersPositive17:09
Good leaders should be willing to update their thinking with new information.
“a willingness to update your thinking. is incumbent on any sort of good leader”
Listen at 17:09

Statements are attributed to the speaker as said on the episode and reflect their view at the time, not PodLume's. They are not advice.

Books & mentions

Some links are affiliate links — PodLume may earn a commission if you buy.

How to Not Know, The Value of Uncertainty in a World that Demands Answers

Stolzoff’s book expands the episode’s argument about uncertainty and the limits of demanding definitive answers.

Weekly email

State of the Pod, every Monday

The week's most-discussed names and stories from podcasts, with the moments behind them. Free, five minutes, unsubscribe in one click.