Oct 6, 2026 · 27 min
Washington ballot measures put transgender rights under scrutiny
When Gender Identity is on The Ballot
The proposals could impose invasive sex verification in school sports and weaken protections addressing bullying, discrimination, parental rights, and school notifications.
- 1Washington’s initiative process has moved two consequential measures directly to voters outside the normal legislative process.
- 2The sports proposal offers no clear medical or enforcement standard for verifying girls’ sex eligibility.
- 3The second measure could weaken school protections while placing broader national attacks on transgender and LGBTQ+ people in local politics.
Don't miss
Laurie Jinkins details why the proposed sex-verification rules offer neither healthcare professionals nor sports officials a clear way to enforce them.
The brief
Washington voters are being asked to decide two initiatives backed by wealthy MAGA-aligned donor Brian Haywood: one targeting girls’ sports and another weakening protections for children in schools.
House Speaker Laurie Jinkins explains how the initiative process moved the proposals outside the usual legislative route, leaving voters to parse complex questions with major consequences.
The sports measure could require examinations of reproductive anatomy, genetics, or testosterone, despite such procedures not being part of ordinary school physicals.
Its enforcement problem is stark: healthcare professionals lack clear instructions about what to examine or test, while sports officials have no workable implementation guidance.
The second initiative would repeal or weaken protections involving parental rights, harassment, bullying, discrimination, and school notifications, amid broader attacks on transgender and LGBTQ+ people.