ChatGPT

Points of view

Share of the 30 posts that take a position

• ChatGPT is useful for learning and work20%

  ChatGPT and related tools can improve learning and productivity by explaining ideas in different ways, generating examples and practice, and helping with work. Supporters also describe newer models and platform features as useful or promising.

  • “Imagine a classroom where technology can help explain the same concept in several different ways. AI can simplify difficult ideas, provide examples, generate practice questions, and help students approach a topic from another perspective. Tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini can”

    @wabooecnie · Oct 3

  • “🚀🧠 OpenAI DevDay 2026: ChatGPT is becoming a platform. 🤖 Agents 🧩 Apps 💻 Codex 🧠 GPT-6.1 Sol The next question: What will developers build on top of it? #AI #OpenAI #ChatGPT #YourPAI”

    @nithyanantha · Oct 5

  • “OpenAI Co Founder: AI Codes Better Than Anyone I Know #ai #openai #chatgpt #gpt #astra #blender”

    @Promptly_m · Oct 1

• ChatGPT watermarking is weak or intrusive17%

  The EU watermarking system is criticized as easy to evade, difficult for ordinary people to verify, and potentially harmful to privacy. Critics describe it as burdensome or mainly useful for compliance rather than meaningful transparency.

  • “Openai will watermark chatgpt output by default, but only for the eu. unreliable and easy to strip, so mostly it's a paperwork tax on people who follow rules.”

    @Elonsfannumber1 · Oct 7

  • “OpenAI's textGrain adds an invisible watermark to ChatGPT text in the EU — but swapping 10% of words drops detection 92% to 66%, and the detector stays researchers-only. @OpenAI”

    @PaulDerrington · Oct 7

  • “#OpenAi just announced text watermarking on ChatGPT outputs. Your AI-generated content is now trackable. Identifiable. Logged. This is exactly why @SolRouterAI was built. Encrypted prompts. Open-weight models. No Big Tech in the loop. Tune in Tuesday Oct. 13th 3pm UTC for”

    @ptservlor · Oct 7

• Human connection over ChatGPT emotional support13%

  People should rely on community and genuine human conversations rather than ChatGPT for therapy, emotional support, or feeling heard. They argue that human relationships offer greater emotional depth and that dependence on AI reflects a lack of community.

  • “Society has done a great job making new mothers feel extremely isolated and alone so no… what’s more embarrassing to me, is the fact that there isn’t community. Somewhere she can express herself and feel human connection but that she has to use chat gpt to feel heard or seen”

    @fairyfilth · Sep 30

  • “one of my favourite things to do (as I yearn for human connection)… I always TRY to have ACTUAL convos with people, and a lot of responses are to “google it” “ask ChatGPT” so whenever I am asked something in need at another time, they get that right back. because wydm!!”

    @haitchtbby · Oct 5

  • “What is truly safer: risking the burn of unconditional human depth, or settling into the comfort of synthetic warmth? A reflection on Shakespeare, Modigliani, Jeanne Hébuterne, and the architectural ethics of emotional AI.”

    @aLexKriz83 · Oct 4

• OpenAI should improve service and access10%

  OpenAI should address outages, limits, credits, pricing, and regional availability more responsibly, especially for paying or longtime users. Some users say these problems push them toward competitors.

  • “OpenAI will sell you a language model like a colleague. It will not tell you to stop when the colleague is broken. Their own status page: elevated errors across ChatGPT, Codex, and the API. Conversations, login, search, uploads, images, agents, Codex. Then more errors on Space”

    @neilhamson · Sep 30

  • “@OpenAI @ChatGPT @thsottiaux had 9 acc: 4 20x and 5 5x Now after this DevDay and this GPT 6.1 Sol, I have ZERO Nothing personal, and I don't even like Anthropic, but when you get better I perhaps come back”

    @vittozao · Sep 30

Other views: 40%