Nov 2, 2026 · 57 min
Federal election pressure tests limits of executive power
The Trump Modus Operandi
The episode examines whether last-minute federal intervention, threats, and litigation can disrupt election administration and weaken peaceful transfers of power.
- 1Courts rejected rushed federal efforts to segregate ballots and alter election procedures in Alaska and California.
- 2Unreliable citizenship lists and threats against election officials risk chilling lawful voting even when investigations remain permissible.
- 3Legal disputes involving James Comey, East Potomac Golf Course, and Donald Trump reveal a broader pattern of institutional pressure.
Don't miss
The hosts warn that even when courts block rushed election interventions, the government may later use those blocked actions to challenge results.
The brief
Mary McCord and Andrew Weissmann open before Election Day, as federal officials pursue last-minute interventions in Alaska and California that could affect ballot handling.
The hosts argue that the Department of Justice is crossing limits once used to protect election administration, raising risks for lawful voting and peaceful transfers of power.
Courts reject efforts to segregate ballots tied to alleged noncitizens and to alter Alaska’s ballot process, citing secrecy, standing, practicality, and weak evidentiary foundations.
The episode links unreliable citizenship lists and criminal warnings to voter intimidation, while judges, state officials, and voting-rights groups resist federal pressure.
Later disputes over James Comey, East Potomac Golf Course, a Washington security facility, and Donald Trump’s dismissed defamation suit reinforce the same institutional pattern.
Weekly email
State of the Pod, every Monday
The week's most-discussed names and stories from podcasts, with the moments behind them. Free, five minutes, unsubscribe in one click.