Nov 11, 2026 · 60 min
Midterms Give Congress New Leverage Over Trump Administration
Aftermath of a Blue Tsunami
The episode maps how congressional oversight, spending power, courts, and state attorneys general could test executive authority after the midterms.
- 1A Democratic Congress could use subpoenas, hearings, appropriations, and litigation to constrain the administration.
- 2The hosts connect DOJ departures and alleged politicized prosecutions to a broader loss of institutional independence.
- 3Judicial challenges and shifting state attorneys general could create new obstacles for administration projects and policies.
Don't miss
The hosts connect the administration’s shifting explanations in the arch and golf-course cases to judicial demands for credible factual support and possible ethical review.
The brief
Mary and Andrew treat the midterms as a repudiation of the administration, then outline how Congress can use oversight and spending power to respond.
The hosts argue that threats against oversight, politicized prosecutions, and rapid DOJ departures raise a deeper question: can the department still act independently?
They examine the Alaska Senate investigation and impeachment articles against Pete Hegseth, focusing on selective prosecution, military law, civilian casualties, and press restrictions.
Court fights over the arch and golf course expose shifting government explanations, while a special master may investigate misleading representations by government lawyers.
The episode closes on the border wall and a changing state-level landscape, where Congress can withhold funds and new attorneys general may join legal challenges.
Weekly email
State of the Pod, every Monday
The week's most-discussed names and stories from podcasts, with the moments behind them. Free, five minutes, unsubscribe in one click.