Nov 3, 2026 · 1h 29m
Final polls put Senate control within reach across red states
Last Call for Takes!
The episode tests whether Democrats can overcome Republican state fundamentals and what the results would reveal about Trump’s coalition, polarization, and economic voting.
- 1Democrats enter Election Day with credible Senate opportunities in traditionally Republican states, but late-deciding voters may restore the usual partisan balance.
- 2Trump’s campaign choices and closing message have helped put vulnerable Republican candidates under scrutiny across several pivotal Senate contests.
- 3The night’s results could distinguish among polling error, turnout, candidate quality, and the durability of Trump’s political coalition.
Don't miss
The hosts use Donald Trump’s election-eve fixation on White House landscaping and renovations to crystallize their argument about his detachment from governing and the campaign.
The brief
Jon Favreau, Jon Lovett, and Tommy Vietor approach Election Day with Senate control in play, weighing optimism against the red-state fundamentals that could blunt Democratic gains.
They argue Donald Trump’s election-eve focus on White House renovations, rallies, and headlines reflects political detachment—and review the candidate choices that helped put Republicans on defense.
The race-by-race tour moves from Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan to Adam Hamilton in Kansas, Mary Peltola in Alaska, and James Tallarico in Texas, where polling challenges party expectations.
Ohio, Iowa, and Maine sharpen the central tension: strong Democratic candidates may benefit from an adverse national environment, but local partisan loyalties remain powerful.
The hosts close by asking what different results would reveal about polarization, turnout, polling error, economic voting, and the durability of Trump’s coalition beyond this election.
What was said on this episode
42 statements · 11 positive · 26 negative · 1 mixed · 4 neutral
Trump’s staff no longer controls his public behavior.
“his staff now has no control over him”
Listen at 7:55
Trump’s support for Ken Paxton substantially changed the Texas Senate race.
“paxton over cornyn is probably the cleanest because it just absolutely put i mean who knows what the actual race would be now if it were cornyn versus talarico but totally changed the dynamic”
Listen at 9:31
Choosing J.D. Vance put Ohio’s Senate seat into the 2026 election.
“Put Ohio on the ballot in 26.”
Listen at 10:14
Renewed conflict between the United States and Iran is more likely than not.
“So I think renewed conflict is more likely than not.”
Listen at 12:29
Renewed conflict between the United States and Iran is more likely than not.
“So I think renewed conflict is more likely than not.”
Listen at 12:29
Pickaxe Mountain is more likely than not to be targeted.
“Pickaxe Mountain is more likely than not to be a target”
Listen at 12:32
Pickaxe Mountain is more likely than not to be targeted.
“Pickaxe Mountain is more likely than not to be a target”
Listen at 12:32
The reported Iranian nuclear-weapons rationale is fabricated.
“I personally think the nuclear weapons part is made up.”
Listen at 12:41
A MOAB strike would have no strategic impact but would appeal to Trump’s preferences.
“That option makes sense because it would have no strategic impact, but it would be a thing Trump would like to talk about.”
Listen at 13:06
The U.S.-Iran war remains ongoing.
“The war is not over.”
Listen at 13:16
Keeping the Strait of Hormuz open requires major U.S. forces and monthly spending.
“It requires 50,000 US troops. 20 Navy ships, two carrier strike groups, an additional two to three billion dollars a month above normal military spending.”
Listen at 13:23
Trump will probably escalate against Iran to demonstrate dominance.
“I think Trump is leaning that way because I think he doesn't care about politics. I mean, look, like we said at the top, the ballroom press events to like close out the midterms shows he doesn't care about politics anymore. I think he just wants to show that he can dominate the Iranians and will probably do it.”
Listen at 14:26
Trump will likely escalate against Iran to demonstrate dominance.
“I think he just wants to show that he can dominate the Iranians and will probably do it.”
Listen at 14:37
Abdul El-Sayed handled questions about Haley Stevens effectively and stayed issue-focused.
“I think Abdul actually handled the questions about Haley quite well at the press conferences he did and tried to stay focused on the issues.”
Listen at 24:12
Haley Stevens’s actions probably will not significantly affect Michigan’s election outcome.
“I kind of think her antics won't have a big impact on the outcome.”
Listen at 24:24
Haley Stevens’s actions probably will not significantly affect Michigan’s election outcome.
“I kind of think her antics won't have a big impact on the outcome.”
Listen at 24:24
Haley Stevens’s intervention might mobilize Democratic voters.
“There is a chance maybe this rallies the base too.”
Listen at 24:51
Haley Stevens’s intervention might mobilize Democratic voters.
“There is a chance maybe this rallies the base too.”
Listen at 24:51
Haley Stevens’s intervention will likely backfire politically.
“I'm pretty convinced it will backfire”
Listen at 25:21
Abdul El-Sayed disavowed and disagreed with the controversial advertisement.
“Abdul did denounce. First of all, he had already disavowed it. He then disavowed and disagreed with it.”
Listen at 26:06
Haley Stevens is receiving support from Democratic voters already opposed to Abdul El-Sayed.
“I have a feeling That she is getting a lot of applause from a subset of Democratic voters who are planning to vote for against Abdul anyway.”
Listen at 27:20
El-Sayed would be a thoughtful, substantive Senate policy voice.
“Abdul in the Senate will just be an interesting. thoughtful policy voice around a whole range of issues.”
Listen at 38:50
The Times/Siena polling has historically performed well in Kansas.
“They have a track record of actually calling the ball right in Kansas”
Listen at 47:32
Democrats should compete for Senate victories in Republican-leaning states.
“The idea that it's better to talk about abolishing the Senate than actually competing and winning these places, I think is pretty foolish.”
Listen at 48:28
Trump will use the ballot-stacking controversy as a pretext to overturn an Alaska loss.
“will Trump try to use this story as a pretext to overturn the results if Republicans lose? I think, one, we don't know. Two, absolutely.”
Listen at 51:04
Trump will likely use the ballot-stacking story to challenge an Alaska loss.
“will Trump try to use this story as a pretext to overturn the results if Republicans lose? I think, one, we don't know. Two, absolutely.”
Listen at 51:04
The Alaska ballot-stacking effort was foolish and is backfiring.
“it was a ham-handed, foolish attempt to do some dirty tricks that I think is backfiring pretty badly.”
Listen at 51:25
The Alaska ballot-stacking effort is backfiring against its Republican proponents.
“it was a ham-handed, foolish attempt to do some dirty tricks that I think is backfiring pretty badly.”
Listen at 51:25
A Republican super PAC spent approximately $500,000 to recruit a Green Party candidate in Alaska.
“The main Republican super PAC spent like 500 grand to get a Green Party candidate who lives in Arizona to run.”
Listen at 54:05
Late-deciding voters were breaking Republican by nine points in the polling.
“it also shows late-breaking voters going towards Republicans by plus nine”
Listen at 55:31
Ken Paxton is an exceptionally poor political candidate.
“Paxton is such a historically terrible candidate.”
Listen at 58:06
Ken Paxton is an exceptionally poor political candidate.
“Paxton is such a historically terrible candidate.”
Listen at 58:06
Rob Sand has a strong field operation in Iowa.
“Rob's got a really good field program”
Listen at 1:02:59
Republicans spent approximately $100 million opposing Josh Turek.
“The pessimistic case for Josh Turek in that Senate race is the Republicans spent, I think, $100 million against him.”
Listen at 1:03:08
Republicans spent approximately $100 million opposing Josh Turek.
“The pessimistic case for Josh Turek in that Senate race is the Republicans spent, I think, $100 million against him.”
Listen at 1:03:08
Sherrod Brown was the strongest candidate Democrats could have nominated in Ohio.
“Sherrod is a great candidate. He's like the best candidate we could have run.”
Listen at 1:09:12
Susan Collins has built goodwill through longstanding local political work.
“She has done a lot of just good old fashioned politics in Maine for a very, very, very long time.”
Listen at 1:14:01
Democrats failing to win both chambers would constitute an electoral loss.
“If we can't win both chambers, then yes, that will be a loss.”
Listen at 1:16:28
A complete Democratic sweep would show Trump’s political fever has ended.
“Full sweep. Would show that the fever is broken completely.”
Listen at 1:20:34
El-Sayed performing near Benson would inform center-left presidential strategy.
“if Abdul runs close to Jocelyn Benson, doesn't have to get right up next to Jocelyn Benson, but doesn't kind of perform, I think, Far under”
Listen at 1:21:17
Large political spending could help Ken Paxton win despite an unfavorable environment.
“If Elon Musk can spend half a billion dollars in these races and the crypto industry can spend $200 million in these races. If that money can get Ken Paxton over the finish line”
Listen at 1:22:59
Large political spending can buy elections in the post-Citizens United era.
“elections can be bought and we're in like a very terrible post-Citizens United new paradigm here.”
Listen at 1:23:14
Statements are attributed to the speaker as said on the episode and reflect their view at the time, not PodLume's. They are not advice.
Weekly email
State of the Pod, every Monday
The week's most-discussed names and stories from podcasts, with the moments behind them. Free, five minutes, unsubscribe in one click.