Reuters
OrganizationOn 3 shows in Markets & Investing this week · 3.1× usual · most on Prof G Markets
Reuters is a British international news agency and news division wholly owned by Thomson Reuters. It produces and distributes reporting, photographs, video, and other news content worldwide, with roughly 2,500 journalists and 600 photojournalists operating across about 200 locations and 165 countries in 16 languages.
Rank this week
Share of the conversation
1.9‰ of what listeners heard
Reach this week
Tone this week
- Neutral 4
Share of the conversation
Mentions of Reuters per 1,000 mentions of anything, 7-day rolling, markets & investing.
Show the data
| Day | Share (7-day) | Mentions |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 12 | 5.78‰ | 1 |
| Aug 13 | 0.85‰ | 3 |
| Aug 14 | 0.98‰ | 1 |
| Aug 27 | 0.56‰ | 2 |
| Sep 1 | 0.75‰ | 1 |
| Sep 6 | 0.45‰ | 1 |
| Sep 8 | 0.53‰ | 1 |
| Sep 10 | 1.39‰ | 3 |
| Sep 12 | 1.59‰ | 1 |
| Sep 14 | 1.52‰ | 1 |
| Sep 15 | 1.78‰ | 2 |
| Sep 16 | 2.97‰ | 5 |
| Sep 17 | 2.38‰ | 1 |
| Sep 18 | 2.51‰ | 1 |
| Sep 29 | 0.21‰ | 1 |
| Sep 30 | 0.63‰ | 2 |
| Oct 2 | 0.85‰ | 1 |
| Oct 4 | 1.04‰ | 1 |
| Oct 5 | 1.26‰ | 1 |
| Oct 7 | 0.81‰ | 1 |
Why is it trending?· Last 7 days
Reuters reporting exposes Anthropic’s rapid growth and enormous losses
Reuters reporting on Anthropic’s leaked S-1 is driving discussion of its financial condition, including $4.6 billion in revenue and an $8 billion operating loss.[1][2]
On Prof G Markets, Ed Elson said Reuters reported Anthropic’s $4.6 billion revenue growth alongside an $8 billion operating loss and a $42 billion net loss.[3]
WSJ’s Take On the Week said a Reuters reporter obtained the confidential S-1, which included a risk factor about AI potentially harming humanity and could affect Anthropic’s IPO timing.[4]
Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing described Reuters and the Financial Times as having only selected information from leaked documents, prompting questions about who leaked them and why.[5]
Receipts with Catherine Rampell cited Reuters for the Trump administration’s explanation that Canada-related bans were intended to discourage retaliation, while questioning the policy’s purpose.[6]
Sources · 6 moments
- 1.Prof G Markets · 5 Stocks Are Carrying The Market — Here's How To Protect YourselfEd Elson · Oct 5 · Listen at 6:50 ↗
“into OpenAI and Anthropic over potential safety and consumer protection concerns. The news came during an already chaotic week for both companies. OpenAI announced that it would not release its latest Astra model due to safety concerns. And”
- 2.Prof G Markets · Steve Eisman: One Company Could Break The AI BoomEd Elson · Oct 2 · Listen at 6:30 ↗
“Well, this is very relevant to the news that we just got this week, which is we now have some insight into how Anthropic is doing as a business. Uh, this was the reporting from Reuters. Who knows, by the time this episode comes out, maybe t”
- 3.Prof G Markets · Anthropic’s Financials Revealed — The Losses Are StunningEd Elson · Sep 30 · Listen at 2:28 ↗
“on reports that the new CEO, John Ternus, is planning to slim down the company. Okay. What else is happening? Anthropic's IPO prospectus just leaked and the numbers are staggering. According to Reuters, which obtained the draft of the S-1,”
- 4.WSJ's Take On the Week · Quarterly Earnings Reports May Be Over Soon. Is That Bad News For Investors?Miriam Gottfried · Oct 4 · Listen at 4:19 ↗
“Another theory is that maybe these companies aren't ready to go public and this is their way of delaying that. I mean, I don't know enough about that, but there was some information that was actually leaked this past week. A Reuters reporte”
Written by AI from the cited moments; every quote is checked against the transcript.
The conversation on X
X mostly recirculates Reuters-linked Anthropic filing details and broader wire reports
Posts about the podcast story mainly repeat figures and claims attributed to Reuters about Anthropic’s revenue, losses, financing, valuation ambitions and AI safety warnings.
Some posts interpret the losses and financing as evidence of an unusually large compute bill or possible IPO risk, while most simply report information without judging Reuters or Anthropic.
The sample also contains many unrelated posts that merely cite Reuters for world, business, sports or photo news, so X is discussing Reuters broadly rather than focusing only on the Anthropic investigation.
95% of the 20 posts report news or ask questions without taking a position.
Tone toward Reuters on X
Neutral
- Very negative 2
- Negative 2
- Neutral 16
Also discussed
- Anthropic IPO filing
- AI losses and infrastructure financing
- AI safety warnings
- Reuters as a news source
- Unrelated Reuters wire reports
- Note: The sample is dominated by brief reposts and headlines, with little direct evaluation of Reuters’ reporting.
- Note: Many posts concern unrelated Reuters stories, and several figures or claims are presented without enough context to assess them from the sample alone.
Written by AI from 20 posts on X in the week to Oct 5. Shares count the posts read, not a poll of opinion; quoted posts are shown as written.
Discussed alongside
Names that come up in the same conversations as Reuters.
Embed this
Paste this on your site to show Reuters's current trend:
<iframe src="https://podlume.ai/embed/e/reuters" width="360" height="220" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Reuters on PodLume Trends"></iframe>