What podcasts say about AI regulation
Every statement, with the speaker, the exact quote and the moment it was said.
What experts have said about AI regulation
13 statements · 7 positive · 5 negative · 1 neutral
AI requires greater regulatory involvement and a stronger regulatory framework.
“I do think there's a bit of a kind of regulatory, um, and more regulatory involvement. We need more of a regulatory framework.”
Open the episode · Why T. Rowe Price’s Iona Dent believes it’s not time to leave the equities party yetListen at 18:59
AI companies should begin self-regulation.
“it's smart to say, let's self-regulate one”
Open the episode · Tom Lee and Dan Ives Explain EverythingListen at 20:22
AI regulations should target actual problems.
“Regulations should solve actual problems.”
Open the episode · Jensen Huang: The Doomer Hoax, Superintelligence Is Here, and The Future of AI (ft. President Trump)Listen at 10:39
AI faces greater risk from overregulation than underregulation
“the risk at this point is overregulation, not underregulation”
Open the episode · Ask the Mates anything | MOONSHOTS AMA #289Listen at 25:18
Governments should favor light AI regulation and industry self-governance
“single best bet is find the right path to a regulation-light regime and let this— let the industry to the best of its ability sort itself out”
Open the episode · Ask the Mates anything | MOONSHOTS AMA #289Listen at 27:04
Policymakers should be cautious before regulating artificial intelligence.
“You know, be. Be careful before you start, before you start regulating.”
Open the episode · Michael Kratsios on the New Golden Age of American Science | EP #276Listen at 3:59
AI enforcement should target actions and outcomes rather than model intelligence.
“I'd much much rather see enforcement leveled at the action layer police what the AIs are doing or being used to do, not what they're thinking or how smart they are.”
Open the episode · Dario vs Jensen on Open Weights, OpenAI & Anthropic in DC, Xi Exports AI to Global South | EP #275Listen at 24:28
AI regulation would serve the public interest.
“there's a strong consensus there should be some AI regulation”
Open the episode · Mira Murati's 975B Open Model, Ramin Hasani on Post-Transformer AI, and Demis' AI FINRA | EP #271Listen at 5:37
AI governance should regulate harmful actions rather than model capabilities.
“regulating the actions that in at least the western legal canon that we do do and that I'd be much more supportive of”
Open the episode · Mira Murati's 975B Open Model, Ramin Hasani on Post-Transformer AI, and Demis' AI FINRA | EP #271Listen at 15:57
No existing mechanism can regulate rapidly advancing AI effectively.
“I see no mechanism to regulate AIs moving way too quickly”
Open the episode · Mira Murati's 975B Open Model, Ramin Hasani on Post-Transformer AI, and Demis' AI FINRA | EP #271Listen at 17:20
A detailed, perfect AI regulatory system cannot currently be designed.
“I don't think it would be possible right now to sort of figure out a detailed, perfect regulatory scheme or system of laws.”
Open the episode · #2525 - Nick BostromListen at 1:37:57
Chamath predicts new AI regulations will be enacted.
“I think that regulations are coming.”
Open the episode · Elon's Anthropic Deal, The Next AI Monopoly?, "FDA for AI" Panic, Trading the AI BoomListen at 40:13
David Sacks recommends targeted AI regulation rather than broadly halting technological progress.
“we should have specific solutions for specific problems as opposed to being cowering in fear over this and just trying to halt all progress.”
Open the episode · SpaceX-Cursor Deal, SaaS Debt Bomb, New Apple CEO, SPLC Indictment, Colon Cancer SpikeListen at 3:11
Statements are attributed to the speaker as said on the episode and reflect their view at the time, not PodLume's. They are not advice.